http://duartelevy.eu/2011/06/16/pais-de-maddie-processam-goucha-sargento-e-hernani-carvalho/
Maddie's parents sue Goucha, Sergeant and Hernani Carvalho
Luis Manuel Goucha Paul Sergeant and Hernani Carvalho started yesterday, Wednesday, to be made defendants in a case in defamation brought by Kate and Gerry McCann.
The indictment, which was presented by the couple's lawyer in Portugal, is also aimed at the management of TVI.It was in a program presented on TVI that the alleged crime has occurred.
Asked the forensic expert and psychologist Paul Sergeant - yesterday accused constituted - has confirmed the information and stressed "that yesterday but did not provide any statements that weighs responding during the process because he knows the elements that can lead to the reopening of the investigation into the disappearance of Madeleine McCann . "
Curious detail, the process is not under judicial secrecy.
Source close to Maddie's parents confirmed the complaint and added "that other processes can still occur."
The indictment, which was presented by the couple's lawyer in Portugal, is also aimed at the management of TVI.It was in a program presented on TVI that the alleged crime has occurred.
Asked the forensic expert and psychologist Paul Sergeant - yesterday accused constituted - has confirmed the information and stressed "that yesterday but did not provide any statements that weighs responding during the process because he knows the elements that can lead to the reopening of the investigation into the disappearance of Madeleine McCann . "
Curious detail, the process is not under judicial secrecy.
Source close to Maddie's parents confirmed the complaint and added "that other processes can still occur."
--------------
Yeah, yeah, of course Arguido Sargento knows the Ace Gonc has up his Sleeve.
Anyone asked him why he is withholding evidence, then?
A reminder of what Arguido Sargento did:
ReplyDeletehttp://aeiou.expresso.pt/psicologo-e-arguido-por-quebrar-sigilo-no-caso-do-violador-de-telheiras=f620827
Quote:
On March 30, TVI showed images of the suspect to touch the bell, to enter and exit a building, believed to be the office of Paul Sergeant at Campo Pequeno in Lisbon. Images were announced under the heading "Crime, he said," the reporter Hernani Carvalho, during the "You on TV," Manuel Luis Goucha. And have been captured a day before being arrested by the Henry Judicial Sotero.
---------
Arguido Sargento isn't the only one in trouble:
Henrique Paulo Sotero filed a complaint against Sergeant and accuses him of having their identity disclosed to the time and place of consultation with leaders of TVI. Hernani Carvalho, Júlio Magalhães Chief Information Officer, TVI, and journalists Peter and John Carlos Enes Matoso are also defendants.
------------
What else can you expect from Team Gonc?
A leopard never changes spots, Bonny
ReplyDeleteHere's the thing, Tony.
ReplyDeleteThe nutjob haters had all convinced themselves that Gonc had 'won' because his book was unbanned.
They decided to ignore the small detail that that was on Yuman Rites grounds, which are always shaky.
They also ignored the small detail that, within hours, his criminal conviction for lying etc., was unheld which made his book only fit for use as toilet paper.
They also forgot that the libel case proper covers his bizarre interviews, etc.
And most especially, his ridiculous pretendy 'documentary' - I recall, some of us watched it for ten minutes and were howling with laughter at the rubbish in it.
So, all those involved in that farce are in the dock, too.
I read somewhere that The Law of Secrecy is not always invoked in Portugal, and that it is for The Coordinator to decide on whether or not it should happen.
ReplyDeleteThis does not surprise me at all since Gonc had already decided on Day One, according to his book, that The McCanns were guilty. This was Gonc's gateway to leaks, and eventually his book.
I believe that he deliberately invoked The Secrecy Law so that he could later lie with impunity. And then make loads of money, as had his colleague in another Missing Child Case.
Basically, he never expected that The McCanns would kick back. He obviously has no conception of people who are not intimidated by the likes of he.
This is interesting; a better translation has turned up:
ReplyDeleteManuel Luis Goucha, Paulo Sargento and Hernâni Carvalho have been made arguidos yesterday, Wednesday, in a libel action started by Kate and Gerry McCann.
The criminal complaint, initiated by the couple’s lawyer in Portugal, also affects the TVI administration. It was during a talk show broadcasted by TVI that the alleged crime has occurred.
The psychologist Paulo Sargento – arguido since yesterday – confirmed the information and stated “that he did not speak yesterday but that he intends to do so during the proceedings because he has knowledge of elements which may lead to the reopening of the inquiry related to the disappearance of Madeleine McCann.”
An interesting detail is that the process is not under the law of secrecy of justice.
A source close to Maddie’s parents has confirmed the complaint and added that “other complaints may still occur”.
-------------
The psychologist Paulo Sargento – arguido since yesterday
-----------
This suggests this is NOT the libel case; it is in criminal territory.
And there's one born every minute:
ReplyDeleteAnonymous said... 37
Ive just had a call from my Sister-in-law who lives in London, Bayswater area, her Daughter has got herself a new Fella, well his Father is in the know at SY and has said in his opinion its not looking good for the McCanns right now, and this is just the start of the review!!!!!!!
___________________
OK, own up? Who is that taking the p*ss on the Morais blog?
Her posters will fall for it as usual. They do all the time.
ReplyDeleteHas your hairdresser's brother in law's, cousin's nephew heard anything about it from SY, Bonny?
Of course, Lily! 'everyone' knows the McCanns DONE IT, but see, cos there is this really really huge conspra-- consipr---plot cos theyre all Secret Masons wiv funny handshakes, its all being covered up, innit?
ReplyDeleteGood point here, on the subject of people making money off a missing child, inspired by Ms Brown the pretendy profiler:
http://www.slippingthroughmyfingers.com/2011/06/16/how-many-is-that-now/#more-3466
Quote:
So how many now have made a nice little earner?
Goncalo Amaral - Two Books namely Truth of the Lie and The English Gag
Tony Bennett - 60 Reasons and various leaflets plus a book version of the files which can be read for free on the internet.
Paulo Pereira Cristóvão - A Estrela de Madeleine
Brian Johnson - Faked Abduction
Stevo - Various sites with paypal buttons on them including one selling "Dogs don't lie" merchandise
Some blogs hosted on a free platform yet they still have a paypal button stuck on them.
Pat Brown - Profile of the Disappearance of Madeleine McCann (UPDATED)
----------
Funny how every single one of them is a hater,oops, I mean Truthseeker.
They are all leaches, every one. Exploiting a missing child to make some bucks.
ReplyDeleteCome across this re the fake Pat Brown profiler.
ReplyDeleteShe's as bigger shit stirrer than Bennet is.
Part One
Somewhere on the Internet, I forget on which blog, I once defended Brown. The author of a post was complaining that Brown was a dilettante in the world of criminal profiling. I'm unsure of the exact nature of his complaints but he pretty much claimed she was a liar, a fraud and didn't deserve any respect. I defended Brown, though I was in no way a fan, because at that time I didn't see what her lack of formal profiling training had to do with her worth as a professional.
But I didn't know then that aside from formal training in criminal profiling Brown also lacked compassion, common sense and most importantly class, as evidenced by this post where Brown claims that Victoria Lindsay, the girl who was assaulted by 8 teens who video taped the beating and posted it on youtube, deserved what she got:
Quote from Pat Brown, "I am going to be really politically incorrect today. I have been reading up on all the sympathy oozing everywhere on the Internet and in the media for the 16-year-old Victoria Lindsay, the girl who got her butt kicked by six of her friends. Yes, those girls were mean and nasty and deserved to get a jail term. But, for some reason - well, for a pretty good reason - I just don't feel that sorry for Victoria."
Why? First of all, these were her friends - not strangers and not some bullies from school she had tried her best to avoid. Friends - as in these are the girls I hang out with and live with. Water seeks its own level and I wonder that Victoria - were another girl being targeted - wouldn't have gone along with the group melee and thrown some punches herself.
Secondly, why were all these girls so ticked off at Victoria? It is said she talked smack on MySpace, saying some really vicious stuff and saying she was going to fight them. So, she flamed these girls publicly, possibly embarrassing them and humiliating them. Then she said she would fight them. Seems like they brought the fight to her and she turned out to be all bark and no bite; she didn't even throw one punch. She wimped out, took the beating, and begged them to let her go. She wasn't as tough as she tried to pretend to be.
But, regardless of her behaviors, because Victoria ended up the unhappy loser of this girl bashing, she is being made out to be a totally innocent lamb. I am guessing the trash talk she put on MySpace was just the tip of the iceberg for this girl's past behaviors. Apparently, she isn't living at home and her father states in an interview that she has had her share of problems. She clearly admits to her friends during the assault that she had been drunk (during one of the times the girls found whatever she did offensive) and said she had grown up since then.
Hey, this girl is barely sixteen. She has a problem with drinking and she isn't living with her parents. Apparently, Victoria's parents want to blame MySpace instead of their lack of parenting that surely contributed to Victoria ending up as a punching bag.
Say what? By Pat Brown's logic if you're date raped you're partially responsible because you were friends with the guy who did it, and thus probably a rapist yourself. By Brown's logic any victim of a crime that knows the perpetrator is partially to blame for their victimization.
Part two
ReplyDeleteWorse is Brown's insistence that Victoria Lindsay's "flaming" of one of these girls is enough to take away Lindsay's victim status. She's saying that being bad-mouthed on the Internet is a mitigating circumstance, that talking trash about a person makes you less a victim if they physically assault you later. It's a vile and childish thesis that would be reprehensible enough if one of the perpetrators voiced it, for Pat Brown, who assumes the mantle of champion for crime victims, a voice for the voiceless, it becomes contemptible.
I'd better lock my doors because the title of this post might bring the wrath of a bat-wielding Brown down on me like the judgment of the gods! Of course I would have gotten what I deserved in Brown's estimation.
The glee with which Brown dwells on Victoria Lindsay's brutalization and troubled home life makes her seem less like a professional criminologist and more like a spiteful, catty harpy who sees the young girl through the eyes of someone who has yet unresolved issues with girls she went to high school with. It is the delight of a petty and unkind woman who can't bring herself to sympathize with a teenage girl who was victimized and humiliated on camera because she doesn't approve of the scant specifics we happen to know about her life.
It is here that she proves herself a charlatan, a cheap and transparent player on a stage too big for a person so small. The crime-fighting Brown cannot bring herself to even pretend on her free blog that she is disturbed by the violent degradation of a young girl caught on camera, even if that's what a criminal profiler is supposed to say. If she can't rise above her vindictive immaturity, her indecent resentment of the girl, long enough to understand why the rest of us would sympathize with Victoria Lindsay than I find Brown's ability to "profile" anyone highly suspect.
Like a petulant child, Brown demands that we accept her expertise in analyzing the psyche of complex and troubled individuals, yet cannot even look into her simple, jealous, unkind heart and see that her condemnation of Victoria Lindsay is less a product of the teen's behavior and more the product of Brown's disagreeable nature.
Pat Brown is a woman who claims, in essence, to be able to understand sociopaths. If she were more reflective she'd see some irony there.
I shouldn't have defended Brown then, I regret it. I should have taken the time to read all her writings and I would have seen the evidence plainly of what kind of person she is. She's nothing more than a crime groupie, a self-important armchair criminologist who is as full of venom and contempt for the victims of crime as the criminals themselves. Had she not fancied herself a profiler I'd have no doubt she'd be mailing letters to Manson now, or posting anti-Semitic rants on Dailykos.
As long as she got to express her contempt for someone, she'd be happy. And isn't that what much of her career is based on? Contempt for the police? Isn't Pat brown claiming the cops can't do their job right without her?
Stay classy Pat Brown.
Has Morais mentioned this one?
ReplyDeleteViolated school children in Lisbon
A man, aged 29, was arrested by the Directorate of Lisbon and Tagus Valley of the Judicial Police for evidence of crimes of sexual abuse of children.
5:09 p.m.
N º de votos (5)
Comments (2)
Victims, 5 and 6 years of age, attending school in a district of Lisbon, where the suspect worked as a administrative support.
According to PJ, came to determine that the criminal acts occurred within these facilities between March and June, with the last sex act taking place earlier this month.
The detainee will now present the first application for judicial interrogation of coercive measures.
http://www.cmjornal.xl.pt/detalhe/noticias/nacional/portugal/violava-criancas-em-escola-de-lisboa
Oh My, who lives in Viseu
ReplyDeleteSanta Comba Dao
Coffee served as a "facade" to practice prostitution
by AFPHoje
The GNR has identified two women and one cafe owner who allegedly act as a switch and prostitution house in Santa Comba Dão, Viseu district, said today the agency Lusa source of the guard.
The investigation of the GNR, the second commander of the detachment of Santa Comba Dao, John Marques, started in 2010 and completed on Wednesday, with the closure of the establishment after searching the site with the support of ASAE, the SEF (Foreigners and borders) and technical finance.
In searching the site, according to the official GNR, was seized a variety of materials related to prostitution, such as condoms, lubricants, contract accounts for bookkeeping and money, as well as a game machine that was turned into a "slot machine "through an electronic scheme.
The cafe owner was accused constituted by the practice of pimping (aid to prostitution).
In this establishment, described Captain John Marques, who also operated a cafe serving meals, ground floor, and on top of the building, a set of rooms, according to the indications listed, the practice of prostitution and where also the owner resided.
I can't remember, Maggs - which of the Gonc Mafia is it?
ReplyDeleteMore delusion, from one of Vulture's top 'researchers'
ReplyDelete@kikoratton
dewi lennard
#McCann court case in P'gal could blow the lid off the case. Those guys they are sueing are seriously good, and will be not best pleased.
6 hours ago via web
----------
No, they aren't 'seriously good' - they are a shower of chancers and liars.
And who gives one whether they are best pleased or not; time they got hauled into court and told to put up or shut up.
Any bets on Double Arguido Sargento wittering on about pink blankets?
They'll find out. Another bubble will be burst.
ReplyDeleteHow odd! Morais isn't trumpetting these glad tidings, though she may be sulking again as Levy is the Sauce.
ReplyDeleteThey are all still wasting their time wittering about imaginary 'discrepancies'.
Keeps them out of mischief, I suppose.
MM thicko:
ReplyDeleteBTW Isabel Duarte has some nerve to file this criminal complaint when she hasn't even returned Gonçalo Amaral's books to their places of sale. She doesn't even abide by the court's ruling. Who's the criminal here?
--------------
That would be Amoral.
He's the one with the criminal conviction for lying on oath to a Portuguese court.
Which is why Guerra & Paz don't want the books, won't take them back for love nor money.
Amoral has cost them time and money and caused nothing but trouble, with more to come.
spudgun01 Mike Spudgun
ReplyDeleteApparently the #McCanns are objecting to comments made about 'Cuddle Cat' and Madeleines blanket on a TV discussion show.....
1 hour ago »
=============
*SIGH*
How did I know it would involve that blanket?
Good - because if that is anything like correct, then it will stop all this rubbish about what Oprah said for once and for all.