Monday 31 October 2011

Q- WHAT DO YOU CALL A MAN WHO LIES TO NEW SCOTLAND YARD? A- T. BENNETT, LIAR AND FANTASIST



It all started so well, too, there was Bennett, looking impotent, sorry, important, waving his crumpled 'dossier' on total strangers around outside New Scotland Yard, pretending he was going there....when it was actually Belgravia nick he was off to.


The lads there were none too pleased to see him, and I doubt if they were too impressed when they read his racist remarks about them when he reported to the other Hounders.


They will be even less impressed today, now they have the evidence right in front of them that Bennett is a liar and a fantasist.


What he claimed to the Met:

My understanding is that the [Scotland Yard Madeleine Mc Cann Review Team] would welcome any evidence that would assist with the enquiry. You state that you have a first hand information from an insider from the McCann's private investigators. This information would obviously be of interest to the team and they would welcome details of this individual to allow them to interview her if she is able to provide relevant evidence. However, information regarding peoples views and suspicions do not constitute evidence. The team are obliged to consider evidence rather than repetition of the myriad of views and beliefs that individuals choose to interpret from the available information. 


And there, Gentle Readers, is the giant, whopping, LIE.


Because Bennett's Source in Team McCann made a claim about a law group that was physically impossible.


On being caught out telling this whopper, the Pinnochio of Harlow starting wriggling and trying to blame it on the Sauce:


Now, one thing I will say is that it is possible that the source might be mistaken as to precisely who assisted Jane Tanner with her recollections. It seems that Control Risks Group may have been involved. Or Leicestershire Police. Or others who may have had connections to one or other of the security services. All I will add to that is that (1) other information given to us confidentially by this source has been confirmed and we are fully satisfied that the source is authentic and (2) that the source has both first-hand knowledge of certain events and also second-hand knowledge. The information about who helped Jane Tanner with her statements is second-hand rather than first-hand.


In truth, it wasn't 'first hand information' at all; it was some bit of conjured-up tittle tattle and hearsay, from someone who didn't even know if she was talking about IFLG, the police, The Man from U.N.C.L.E., or the Brownies.


If Bennett is lucky, and the Met are feeling benign, they will write him and all his Hounders off as lunatics.
If they aren't, they'll charge him.


But don't you just love the irony, Gentle Readers?


Gonc's Mouthpiece in the UK, one T. Bennett, marked Gonc's birthday by telling a pack of lies to the most senior police force in England.


Way to go, Bennett!






UPDATE: Further babblings from Head Hounder have confirmed what most suspected all along. Yes, the much-vaunted Source is none other than Agent Z Coco Mental Midas Darling, the Knutsford 'lifestyle coach'.



Tuesday 25 October 2011

'PROFILER' BROWN BACKSTABS PITCHFORKER FRIENDS


Ms Brown took time off from making sick 'jokes' about missing babies, to throw cold water on all her little friends' perverted imaginings.

This latest betrayal took place on the Hindley Fan's FB group:

Pat Brown Since it has no bearing on the what happened to Madeleine that night, what is the use of spreading innuendo about a supposed conversation one person isn't even sure of?

Pat Brown I repeat, Dr. Gaspar says herself she does not know what the conversation was about which is why she did not rush to the authorities to report pedophilia or child molestation nor has anyone else validated that anyone at the table was talking about sexually assaulting Madeleine. That is a credibility killer for investigators; to take it further would be improper.

Pat Brown Liz, he saw only a gesture unrelated to subject matter. He and his wife never discussed it. He never talked about her having issues with the man or bathing. Apparently, she is "remembering" stuff her husband does not back

Pat Brown This is Dr. Gaspar's version but NO ONE backs it. Not even her husband. I do not see what the issue is here. Dr. Gaspar clearly states she only 'believes' the conversation was about Madeleine. How can you expect a police department to take a woman seriously who doesn't really know, her husband does not support her statements and she didn't bother to report the incident for years?


Which is what the sane people have been trying to tell them for years....

This didn't go down too well with the Hindley Fan, though.


Linda Wrafter Been out so just catching up, Pat Im shocked to see you say the Gaspars statement had "no bearing on what happened that night" how can you claim this as no one,but McCanns and tapas lot KNOW what happened that night? ,no one on here KNOWS if anything peado related happened that night or other nights in Pdl


Wrong as usual; the only person who KNOWS what happened is the criminal scum that abducted Madeleine McCann.

Isn't it strange how so many of the haters just luurrvvve talking about 'paedos'? Still, what else can you expect from people who sing the praises of Myra Hindley.


Wonder what made Brown slap their perverted fantasies down so strongly? Don't tell me they have disgusted even her?

And how long will it be before they are accusing Brown of being paid off by Carter Ruck, or blackmailed, or any of the other rubbish they spout whenever anyone makes them face reality?

Monday 17 October 2011

Ein Volk, ein Hounder


It's long been rumoured, but we finally got the proof. One of the Hounders, 'tigger' or something, thought this was OK:



Bennett, you f*cking pig. It's long been rumoured about you, but there is the truth, on your own site.

You are a f*cking Nazi pig.

Feel good, has it, strutting about, trying to scare people by photographing their homes, and posting pictures of their homes on the internet?

Get off on scaring children, did you? Probably - doubtless you told yourself they weren't members of the 'master race' like you and your scummy members.

You are a f*cking Nazi pig.

Sunday 9 October 2011

BRAT'S FORMER FRIENDS LINE UP TO STAB HIM IN THE BACK




Heavens to Betsy! Whatever could have caused this treachery, Gentle Readers may be asking.

Well, it all started over this:

http://regretsandramblings.com/2011/10/09/another-man-behind-a-face/

A man who has followers, that hang on and believe his every word. And followers that will wake up one day and realise they are tied to this man for good. Why? Because breaking free will result in them being his next target

Yes, that's Tallulah all right; and one or two of his erstwhile allies can expect to be on the receiving end of his obscenites after they lined up on Twitter to agree with Bren...


Lezs1967 Lesley Greenaway
Brenr has never said anything I agree with but hey credit where due she seems to have Bret spot on on her blog! #McCann he shud be ashamed


justice4maddie Seeking justice
@
@Lezs1967 Im far from Ryan fan, & never will be,but shes got Bret sussed out,ANYONE who thinks cancer is a joke is as low as it gets #mccann

Calfie Calfie
@
@Lezs1967 absolutely and when they see thro him as Bren rightly said they end up on his vile blog #mccann


Little did Tallulah know that rebellion had been brewing behind his back for a few weeks...even supposed devotees like What Carrot were unhappy with the Dear Leader...

Can't say I like David Bret or his vile books, but I do know he has the ear of some very influential people, some that I know and the old Labour crony establishment is still being dismantled.

Stephanie Davies hope scotland yard can do better then......i thought you were perhaps a good friend of david bret..although i know you dont speak like him''..he is vile for goodness sake..

Alison Wall Que, you're NOT a mate of David's? Oh, that's good - I thought you were.
Yesterday at 00:58 · 1 person
Stephanie Davies i thought she was as well
Yesterday at 01:00
Que Cherrett Stephanie, I understand what you mean about David Bret, he said some vile things about Arthur Askey, and Hilda Baker. I am glad to say the publishers refused to print his work on Will Hay as it is still considered to be a libel!!

Que Cherrett Kenneth Williams was a friend of mine, David just takes some of his best lines. I agree with a lot of what he said about this case, but it was me who put in a lot of the leg work for this petition. Occasionally I will like his comments and he mine but I think he can be too harsh with simple people, who I have always rather liked.


Simple people? No wonder he made Chucky 'I know I've got mental health issues' feel at home.

Can we expect Brat devotees like Chucky and Esse to now join in the bloodletting, or are they going to carry on pretending they had nothing to do with him?

Saturday 8 October 2011

BENNETT AND HIS GANG, PERVERTING THE COURSE OF JUSTICE

PERVERTING THE COURSE OF JUSTICE

An ugly phrase, more associated with drug dealers, pimps, loan sharks and the like.

But that is exactly what Bennett - and others - are doing.

He dumped his Stalkers' Handbook on Scotland Yard, claimed some woman knows Secret Things of relevance to the disappearance of a little girl - and refuses to pass on the information.

He boasted last night:

In case it should be thought that we are inventing this source, let me just say here and now that our source has both spoken to us verbally and given us very valuable information in writing. The information we have received from the source has been seen by all members of The Madeleine Foundation and by one or two others. I will mention one name here: 'spudgun'. 'Spudgun' spent the best part of a whole day with me here in Harlow earlier in the year and on the basis that he said nothing about what he had seen to anybody at any time, we disclosed to him the written information we received from that source.

So, it is OK for Mike 'Apeman' Hardy to know what this is all about? Probably, he does seem awfully close to Bennett these days. What was it Spudders told the Brats a few weeks ago?

Mike Hardy Just to update:- I spoke briefly with Tony last night on the telephone where I passed on all our best wishes, for which he was very thankful.

He is labouring under HUGE amounts of stress, not least because his family are urging him, (indeed, have done so for some time), to abandon the whole Madeleine Foundation! Of course, their concern is currently justified, given the huge sums of money that Tony and his family stand to lose!


Nice of Bennett to repay all that concern by publically naming Spudders, wasn't it?

And all the other Hounders know about this Secret Source? Looks like it, here's another one who was merrily blabbing to the Brats:

Susan Beckingham Good. As a member of the Madeleine Foundation
, I wonder even whether forums such as this would exist were it not for people like TB, who for years has rattled the McCanns' cage. Remember that it was TB who originally tried to bring a private prosecution against them for child neglect, as early as Oct/Nov 2007

So, she must know what Bennett is withholding from Scotland Yard.

And what about Esse?
No, more interested in telling Carter Ruck how to write letters..

Anna Silvestro Many years ago when I had gaps in my A Level timetable, we were encouraged to take up a non-exam subject as an extra, which might be useful. I took shorthand and typing. Around about lesson 1 or lesson 2, we were told never to start a letter with, "I write..." because it's obvious that you're writing! I've read a few Carter-Ruck letters now, and I know it's very pedantic of me, but I think they could do with a proof reader to spot the non-professional wording before their letters go out. "We write to inform you.." Well well! Whodda thunk they were writing! Give me strength!

And Chucky? Nah, scrub Chucky, she was too busy going LOOKAME!!! and boring the pants off everyone, as usual...


Carly Michelle Dunham yes carla im not saying thats what happned but its possible we were staying at a hotel when i had my accident and let me tell you even aged 30 at the time i screamed the hotel down

YAWN. Nothing to see there.

Apeman Hardy and others are in big, big trouble though - every time Bennett gets into hot water, he drags other people into it.

They are choosing to withhold evidence from Scotland Yard, so what does that say about them, besides they are the pits of the earth?

But Bennett doesn't even stop there. Because Scotland Yard don't treat him with the respect he imagines he deserves, and are not interested in his stupid gossip and tittle-tattle he reports the lead investigators:


You have also stated you wish to make a complaint against DCI Redwood and DI Dobson


Can you go any lower than that? Bennett and his chums must really, really hate Madeleine McCann, to be trying to wreck Scotland Yard's work in this manner.

And who thinks Gonc knows what they are doing? And probably approves? Is Gonc going to be happy when Bennett ends up in court for this?

Telling Scotland Yard, I was only pretending to have a Secret Source, it's really only that nutjob Agent Z Coco-Mental-Midas is not going to save his skanky ass.

Bennett might like to look up the penalties for the criminal actions he has committed; mind you, if he's in jail, he won't have to worry about a roof over his head after he loses the one he has for his ongoing libel.

Spudgun Hardy and the Foundation are all equally culpable; it's a bit too late for him in particular to be worrying about his media career.

But hey, who cares? There's only one reason this sh*tstorm is heading their way.

It's because the only thing any of them seem to live for is persecuting the parents of a missing child. And persecuting the wider family, and anyone who supports the McCanns in any way whatsoever.

They have brought every single bit of this down on their own heads.

Thursday 6 October 2011

JACK REGAN SAYS: 'SHUT IT, BONNETT!!!!'



Who does that smelly geezer think he is, poncing round wiv his stupid bits of old paper, his bleedin' dossyarse or somethin'?

Thought he was somethin' bleedin' special, goin' on about how he was white an all that racist crap. Like anyone cared what colour he sez he is, looked bleedin' filthy to the lads at the station.

Stupid or what, though? Only goes an' gives us his dossyarse what proves he's been stalkin' people an hidin' in their gardens. That went straight to the lads up in Manchester, an' the briefs what want all the dirt on Bonnett.

Hangs round wiv a right lot of nutters Bonnett does, all gibberin' away an' makin' up crap about plots, the geeks down in IT been watchin' them geezers for a while now.

Keeps them nutjob geezers all on one place, don't it, makes it easier to round them all up an' nick them.

Lads at the Met told Bonnett to where to stick his dossyarse all right. What else did the grubby old geezer expect, turnin' up an' annoyin' the Sweeney when they hadn't had their dinner?

Tuesday 4 October 2011

P.C. DIXON: 'THAT TINY BONNETT'S A WRONG 'UN!'



Evenin' all! My, me and the lads had some right good fun in the station yesterday. We got one of them 'racist nutjobs' you hear so much about nowadays in our nick.

'Course, an old copper like me knows a wrong 'un when he sees one - and they don't come much wronger than that Bonnett.

Been sleeping rough he had, from the looks of him, wavin' these tatty old bits of paper at us and demandin' we look at what he kept callin his 'dossier' what he and some chums of his had written.

Ravin' on he was, summat awful, about masons and plots and such like.

Good job the lads in Harlow nick had warned us he'd escaped again, and was headin' for our Manor.

Looked like a baldin' tramp he did, and he kept givin' officers funny looks and demandin' to know where they really came from and why were they keepin' important white folks like him waitin'.

Good thing it wasn't me on the desk, I can tell you, or Bonnett would've been given a bit of good old-fashioned policin' from the sole of my size 12 boot for racist talk like that.


The Sarge went out to speak to Bonnett, calm him down, like, an' get him out of the station before there was a nasty incident.

We did the old trick, you know, phonin' Sarge after ten minutes to say he was needed urgently to help an old lady cross the road, and Bonnett left like a lamb.

Sarge needed a drop of the station brandy - medicinal, of course! - after he'd gone, and we went through two cans of Febreze gettin' rid of the smell. Cor, Bonnett must've been sleepin' in his clothes, from the state of him.

We had a good old read about Bonnett on the police computer after he'd gone - got a lot of previous, has old Tiny!

Stalkin' the families of missin' kiddies, makin' up stories about people - wouldn't have got away with it in my day, I can tell you, but that's this new-fangled Care in the Community for you.

Best you know to look out for him, in case he fetches up in your manors babblin' and causin' trouble. Here's the villain:


If you good people should see Tiny Bonnett, don't approach him, just let your local nick know so they can ship him back to his home patch.

Mind how you go!

Monday 3 October 2011

TALLULAH MAKES AN AR@E OF HIMSELF AGAIN

Gentle Readers will not be in the slightest bit surprised that Brat has made a wally of himself and his devotees yet again, by ranting incoherently...

This is the latest artist's impression (certainly the first time that I and even many of the Loonies' cult followers themselves have seen it) of a man wanted for questioning in relation Madeleine McCann's disappearanc

Now, it is by no means unusual for Tallulah to rant bullshit (though it does make a change from wishing for people to die in car crashes, be burned in fires, etc) but what, Gentle Readers may ask, is he ranting about this time?

Why, 'tis this picture:


It's the 'new' picture that was on the front page of the Mirror more than two years ago.

Doubtless Case Expert Tallulah was too busy dribbing about people's sexual habits, and scribbling obscene muck about sexual organs and body waste to notice little details like that.