Who does that smelly geezer think he is, poncing round wiv his stupid bits of old paper, his bleedin' dossyarse or somethin'?
Thought he was somethin' bleedin' special, goin' on about how he was white an all that racist crap. Like anyone cared what colour he sez he is, looked bleedin' filthy to the lads at the station.
Stupid or what, though? Only goes an' gives us his dossyarse what proves he's been stalkin' people an hidin' in their gardens. That went straight to the lads up in Manchester, an' the briefs what want all the dirt on Bonnett.
Hangs round wiv a right lot of nutters Bonnett does, all gibberin' away an' makin' up crap about plots, the geeks down in IT been watchin' them geezers for a while now.
Keeps them nutjob geezers all on one place, don't it, makes it easier to round them all up an' nick them.
Lads at the Met told Bonnett to where to stick his dossyarse all right. What else did the grubby old geezer expect, turnin' up an' annoyin' the Sweeney when they hadn't had their dinner?
Oh dear, so sad, too bad.
ReplyDeleteVengeance's comment, copied from previous entry:
ReplyDeleteVengeance said...
He's got the get lost reaction:
Post Tony Bennett Today at 12:08 pm
STATEMENT BY THE METROPOLITAN POLICE 6 OCTOBER 2011
Reproduced below without comment.
STATEMENT by Steve Bentley, Inspector, Directorate of Professional Standards, Metropolitan Police/Scotland Yard
QUOTE
My understanding is that the team would welcome any evidence that would assist with the enquiry. You state that you have a first hand information from an insider from the McCann's private investigators. This information would obviously be of interest to the team and they would welcome details of this individual to allow them to interview her if she is able to provide relevant evidence. However, information regarding peoples views and suspicions do not constitute evidence. The team are obliged to consider evidence rather than repetition of the myriad of views and beliefs that individuals choose to interpret from the available information. UNQUOTE
I think they saw him coming. It's a neat way of calling him a gossiping old prat, isn't it? I await his next move with keen anticipation.
6 October 2011 12:30
Well, well, well. So his 'next move' turns out to be an 'abject grovel' to Brian Kennedy - or does it? My reading of his apology is that he is playing with words, and the moment he thinks he can get away with it he will repeat the libels again and again. He needs to be subjected to the full rigour of the law and be given suitable punishment for his crass, gross, nasty, evil behaviour. He is an old man; he should, like his elders and certainly betters, enjoying his last few years on the earth, socialising with friends, taking Saga holidays, just winding down - NOT harassing, stalking, lying, cheating and generally showing to the world what an obnoxious apology he is for a human being.
ReplyDeleteI see now that bennett, having yesterday supposedly grovelled, is still continuing his libels - how many police forces has he now accused of being corrupt? And he seems to have added Scotland Yard and the Met to the list. His claims to have taken down all the libellous posts on various forums is just that - a lie, a blatent lie. Reading between the lines, I am starting to wonder exactly WHY he has such a dislike of the police - surely, as an upright citizen he should be supporting them, not accusing them of various nefarious deeds; I believe one force has been accused by him of drug-running, others of cover-ups etc. My own take on this is that he is seriously mentally challenged and, unless he is stopped now, he will, if denied access to the McCanns and also is penalised in some way, financially or being jailed for contempt in the upcoming cases being brought against him, seek for some new case to batten on, perhaps another family to stalk and harass. He is a danger to the general public, to those in pain and, most of all to himself.
ReplyDelete